A CASA ALTA NOS ESTADOS FEDERAIS
Resumo
A Casa Alta está presente em quase todos os Estados federais. Além de ser uma garantia contra a vontade tirânica da maioria e de estabilidade das leis, a Casa Alta representa os interesses das entidades subnacionais na formação da vontade federal. Ela, todavia, apresenta uma diversidade de aspectos institucionais no Direito Comparado, desde a sua composição até a forma de investidura e mandato de seus membros. Essa diversidade está relacionada às peculiaridades e contextos de cada Estado, tendo reflexos importantes sobre a importância e o papel que desempenha na Federação.
Referências
ÃFRICA DO SUL. Constitution of 1996 (Atualizada em 2005). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/1VPWx5R>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
ALDER, John. Constitutional and Administrative Law. 10th. ed. London: Palgrave, 2015.
ARGENTINA. Constitución de 1853 (Atualizada em 15/12/1994). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2eedveP>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
AUSTRÃLIA. Constituição de 1900 (com emendas até 1977). DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/rtCU3>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2017.
ÃUSTRIA. Constitution of 1920, Reinstated in 1945, with Amendments through 2013. DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2sYC7LZ>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
BAKVIS, Herman; CHANDLER, Williams M. Federalism and the Role of the State. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1987.
BÉLGICA. Constitution of 1831 (Atualizada em 05/2014). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2sZ4pGh>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
BENTHAM, Jeremy. Jeremy Bentham to His Fellow-citizens of France, on Houses of Peers and Senates. London: Robert Reward, 1830. DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2rOTf9e>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2017
BÓSNIA-HERZEGOVINA. Constitution of 1995 with Amendment through 2009. DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/1VPWx5R>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
BRASIL. Constituição Federal de 1988 (Atualizada em 6/6/2017). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/1eolror>. Acesso em 09 jun. 2017.
BRÄUNINGER, Thomas; KÖNIG, Thomas. The Checks and Balances of Party Federalism: German Federal Government in a Divided Legislature. European Journal of Political Research, v. 36, p. 207-234, 1999.
BUCHANAN, James M.; TULLOCK, Gordon. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of of Michigan Press, 1962.
BÜHLMANN, Marc; HÄNNI, Miriam. Creating a ‘We-feeling’in Heterogeneous Nations: A Cross-country Investigation of the Impact of Inclusion and Autonomy on the National Pride of Ethnic Minorities. Comparative Sociology, v. 11, n. 3, p. 325-353, 2012.
BURDEAU, Georges. Droit Constitutionnel et Institutions Politiques. 6e. ed. Paris: LGDJ, 1972.
BURGESS, Michael. Comparative Federalism: Theory and practice. London; New York: Routledge, 2006
BYRD, Robert C. The Senate of the Roman Republic: Addresses on the History of Roman Constitutionalism. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1995.
CAIRNS, John W. The Origins of the Edinburgh Law School: the Union of 1707 and the Regius Chair. Edinburgh Law Review, v. 11, n. 3, p. 300-348, 2007.
CAMPION, Lord. Second Chambers in Theory and Practice. Parliamentary Affairs, v. 7, n. 1, p. 17-32, 1953.
CANADÃ. Constituição de 1867 (com emenda de 1982). DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/itQZ0>. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2017.
CANADA. Suprema Corte. Reference re Senate Reform. [2014] 1 SCR 704. DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/chmSY>. Acesso em: 14 mai. 2017.
CARRINGTON, C.E.; JACKSON, J. Hampden. History of England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949.
COMORES. Constitution of 2001. DisponÃvel em <http://bit.ly/2s0ONFc>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
DREXHAGE, Betty. Bicameral Legislatures An International Comparison. The Hague: Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, 2015. DisponÃvel em: <https://www.government.nl>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2017.
DUCHACEK, Ivo D. Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970.
ELAZAR, Daniel J. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama, 1991.
ELKINS, Zachary; GINSBURG, Tom; MELTON, James. The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
EMIRADOS ÃRABES UNIDOS. Constituição de 1971 com emenda até 2004. DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/BIPSX>. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2017.
ESTADOS UNIDOS. Constitution of 1787 (Atualizada em 1992). DisponÃvel em <http://bit.ly/2lvunOp>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
ETIÓPIA. Constitution of 1995. DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2a0ugYn>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
FERNANDEZ, Óscar. Reforming the Spanish Senate: a federalist proposal, IFF Working Paper Online No 1, Fribourg, January 2015. DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/agzB9>. Acesso em: 13 mai. 2017.
GRIFFIN, John D.; NEWMAN, Brian Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
GRIFFITHS, Ann L.; NERENBERG, Karl (eds). Handbook of Federal Countries, 2002. Montreal; London; Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002, 2002.
HAMMOND, Basil E. Bodies Politic and their Governments. Cambridge: The University Press, 1915.
HAMMOND, Thomas; MILLER, Gary J. The Core of the Constitution. American Political Science Review, v. 81, n. 4, p. 1155-1174, 1987.
HE, Baogang. The Federal Solution to Ethnic Conflicts. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, v. 7, n. 2, p. 29-36, 2006.
HELLER, William B. Divided Politics: Bicameralism, Parties, and Policy in Democratic Legislatures. Annual Review of Political Science, v. 10, p. 245-269, 2007.
HOROWITZ, Donald L. The Many Uses of Federalism. Drake Law Review, v. 55, p. 101-113, 2007.
ÃNDIA. Constitution of 1950 (Atualizada em 11/2015). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/1YllHt2>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
KING, Preston. Federalism and federation. London: Croom Helm, 1982.
KORHONEN, Outi. Unconventional Dispute Settlement in the Finnish Question (1899 to World War I): The Power of Cultural and Historical Argument in International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, v. 12, n. 02, p. 323-360, 1999.
KRAMER, Jutta. Local Government and City States in Germany. In STEYTLER, Nico (Ed.). The Place and Role of Local Government in Federal Systems. Johannesburg: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, p. 83-94, 2005.
KRAMER, Jutta. Local Government and City States in Germany. In STEYTLER, Nico (Ed). The place and role of local government in federal systems. Johannesburg: KAS, 83-94, 2005.
LECOURS, André Belgium. In GRIFFITHS, Ann L.; NERENBERG, Karl (eds). Handbook of Federal Countries, 2002. Montreal; London; Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002, p. 59-43, 2002.
LECOURS, André. The Parliament of Canada. In LAFOREST, Guy; LECOUR, André (eds). The Parliaments of Autonomous Nations. Toronto: McGill-Queen’s University Press, p. 203-209, 2016.
LEE, Frances E.; OPPENHEIMER, Bruce I. Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 1999,
LEVMORE, Saul. Bicameralism: When are two decisions better than one?. International Review of Law and Economics, v. 12, n. 2, p. 145-162, 1992
LINDER, Wolf; STEFFEN, Isabelle. Swiss Confederation. In LE ROY, Katy; SAUDERS, Cheryl (eds.). Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Governance in Federal Countries, A Global Dialogue on Federalism, Volume 3. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press, p. 289-315, 2006. DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/nPQS7>. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2016.
MADISON, James. Paper n. 62. In HAMILTON, Alexanxer; MADISON, James; JAY, John. The Federalist. Ed. By J.R. Pole. Indianapolis; Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, p. 331-336, 2005.
MALÃSIA. Constitution of 1957 (status 2015). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/1Wl4PSh>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2107.
MALHOTRA, Neil; RASO, Connor Raso. Racial Representation and U.S. Senate Apportionment. Social Science Quarterly, v. 88, p. 1038-1048, 2007.
MARSHFIELD, Jonathan L. Decentralizing the Amendment Power. Lewis & Clark Law Review, v. 19, p. 963, 2015.
MATHEW, George. India. In GRIFFITHS, Ann L.; NERENBERG, Karl (eds). Handbook of Federal Countries, 2002. Montreal; London; Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press, p. 162-177, 2002.
MÉXICO. Constitución de 1917 (Atualizada em 24/02/2017). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2mKDwHf>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
MICRONÉSIA. Constituição de 1979 com emenda de 1990. DisponÃvel em: <http://www.parliament.am/library/sahmanadrutyunner/micronezia.pdf>. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2017.
MILL, John S. Considerations on Representative Government. 2nd. ed. London: Parker, Son, Bourd, West Strand, 1861. DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2t9hU6p>. Acesso em: 13 mar. 2017.
MINTA, Michael D. Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, v. 34, p. 193-218, 2009.
MINTA, Michael D.; SINCLAIR-CHAPMAN, Valeria. A Bicameral Perspective on the Effects of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Congress. In: Legislative Elections, Process, and Policy: The Influence of Bicameralism Conference, Nashville, TN. 2009.
MONEY, Jeannette; TSEBELIS, George. Cicero's puzzle: upper house power in comparative perspective. International Political Science Review, v. 13, n. 1, p. 25-43, 1992.
MONTESQUIEU. L’Esprit des Lois. Paris: Librairie de Firmin Didot Frères, 1851. DisponÃvel em <http://bit.ly/2sQDHjQ>. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2017.
NIGÉRIA. Constitution of 1999. DisponÃvel em <http://bit.ly/2s1330C>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
PAL, Michael. Constitutional Amendment After the Senate Reference and the Prospects for Electoral Reform. Supreme Court Law Review, v. 398, p. 376-398, 2016.
PINARD, Danielle. The Canadian Senate: An Upper House Criticized Yet Condemned to Survive Unchanged?. In LUTHER, Jörg; PASSAGLIA, Paolo; TARCHI, Rolando (eds.). A World of Second Chambers: Handbook for Constitutional Studies on Bicameralism. Milan: Giuffrè, p. 459-520, 2006.
REMINGTON, Thomas F. Majorities without mandates: the Russian Federation Council since 2000. Europe-Asia Studies, v. 55, n. 5, p. 667-691, 2003.
RIKER, William H. The Merits of Bicameralism. International Review of Law and Economics, v. 12, p. 166-168, 1992.
RODDEN, Jonathan; WIBBELS, Erik. Beyond the Fiction of Federalism – Macroeconomic Management in Multitiered Systems. World Politics, v. 54, p. 494-531, 2002.
RUSSELL, Meg. What are second chambers for?. Parliamentary Affairs, v. 54, n. 3, p. 442-458, 2001.
RÚSSIA. Constitution of 1993 (com emendas até 2008). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2rUA1h6>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
RÚSSIA. Presidência da República. Russian Federation Law on amendment to Constitution, 22/07/2014. DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2rPbP11>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2017.
SAGÃœES, Néstor P. El Senado en el Estado Federal y Regional. In IV Congreso Iberoamericano de Derecho Constitucional. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones JurÃdicas, p. 623-634, 1992.
SAMPAIO, José Adércio Leite; PINTO, João Batista Moreira. O Federalismo Ambiental na Austrália e na Ãndia. Veredas do Direito, Belo Horizonte, v. 12, n. 23, p. 67-89, jan./jun. 2015. DisponÃvel em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v12i23.634>. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2017.
SÃO CRISTÓVÃO E NÉVIS. Constitution of 1983. DisponÃvel em <http://bit.ly/28J0PLX>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
SCELLES, Georges. Droit International public, Manuel ÉleÌmentaire (avec les textes essentiels). Paris: Domat-Montchrestien, 1944.
SHARMA, Brij K. Introduction to the Constitution of India. 7th ed. New Dheli: PHI Learning, 2015.
SUDÃO DO SUL. Constituição de 2011. DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/yAG67>. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2017.
SUDÃO. Constitution of 2005. DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/2s0BggH>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017
SUIÇA. Constituição de 1999 com emendas até 2016. DisponÃvel em: <http://encurtador.com.br/bjKS7>. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2017.
SWENDEN, Wilfried. Federalism and second chambers: regional representation in parliamentary federations: the Australian Senate and German Bundesrat compared. Brussels: Peter Lang, 2004.
SWIFT, Elaine K. The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787-1841. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.
TALBERT, Richard JA. The Senate of Imperial Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
TAYLOR, Hannis. Pelatiah Webster. Yale Law Journal, v. 17, n. 2, p. 73-85, 1907.
TRIVELLI, Laurent. Le Bicamérisme. Lausanne: Payot, 1975.
TSEBELIS, George; MONEY, Jeannette. Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
TSEBELIS, George; RASCH, Bjørn E. Patterns of Bicameralism. In DORING, Herbert (ed.). Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, p. 365-290, 1995.
UYTTENDAELE, Marc. Trente Leçons de Droit Constitutionnel. Limal; Bruxelles: Anthémis/Bruylant, 2014
VATTER, Adrian. Bicameralism and policy performance: The effects of cameral structure in Comparative Perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies, v. 11, n. 2, p. 194-215, 2005.
VENEZUELA. Constitución de 1999 (Atualizada em 19/02/2009). DisponÃvel em: <http://bit.ly/1P5sShH>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2017.
WATTS, Ronald L. Comparing Federal Systems in the 1990s. Montreal: Queen’s University Kingston, 1996. DisponÃvel em: <https://goo.gl/cWUN6N>. Acesso em: 11 mar. 2017.
